You’re definitely tapping into a major legal blindspot here. A lot of jurisdictions just haven’t caught up yet. It reminds me of how revenge porn laws evolved years ago — reactive, not proactive. AI-generated images, especially deepfakes or nudified versions of real people, fall into this weird gray area where it’s not always considered “real,” even though the impact on the victim absolutely is. Some argue it’s artistic expression, others say it’s outright harassment. I checked out one of these tools just to understand the tech — undress her — and yeah, the process is disturbingly easy. You upload a photo, and in seconds, the AI “undress her” or whoever is in the picture. That kind of accessibility makes regulation even more urgent. The real issue is proving harm when the image isn’t technically “real.” Defamation, misuse of likeness, emotional distress — all might apply, but only if a judge is willing to interpret the laws broadly. It’s a legal minefield.